Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756912Ab1DZPHy (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:07:54 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:61386 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756842Ab1DZPHw (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:07:52 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,268,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="425734431" Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:07:47 +0200 From: Samuel Ortiz To: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar Cc: davidb@codeaurora.org, dwalker@fifo99.com, linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Mark Brown , Linus Walleij , Thomas Glexiner , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andres Salomon Subject: Re: [PM8921 MFD V5 0/6] pm8921 core and subdevices Message-ID: <20110426150746.GF3175@sortiz-mobl> References: <1302039657-19395-1-git-send-email-adharmap@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1302039657-19395-1-git-send-email-adharmap@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1919 Lines: 45 Hi Abhijeet, On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 02:40:51PM -0700, Abhijeet Dharmapurikar wrote: > This patch series adds support for pmic 8921 chip and its subdevices. > The pmic 8921 chip is used as a power management ic for 8960 based boards. It > communicates over the ssbi bus, ssbi bus can be found here > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/601771/ > > The patch set contains support for interrupt, gpio and mpp (multi purpose pin) > subdevices. > > Note that gpio and mpp subdevices need the interrupt subdevice to > be operational, this is becuase the reading the the value of gpio/mpp lines > happens by doing a transaction over registers managed by the interrupt subdev. > The code invokes a call on interrupt subdevice, rather than writing to those > registers directly, avoiding race conditions. I have applied patch #1 and #2 to my for-next branch. For 3 and4, I'll wait for Grant's ACK. As for #5, I'd like to get an ACK from the current MSM maintainers. Finally, patch #6 will be applied last. > Updates from V4 > Few things have changed in kernel proper since I last sent this series > -The interrupt macro names have changed (more structured)- had to update the irq > patch to use the new macro names > - mfd_cell does not have platfrom_data anymore - use mfd data instead. I'm currently moving that away from the mfd_cell structure, in my for-next branch. mfd_cell now has a platform_data pointer back, and you should use mfd_get_cell() if you really need to reach the mfd_cell pointer (which you apparently don't). Could you please generate patchs 3 and 4 against this branch ? Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/