Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 09:23:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 09:23:47 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([212.34.181.86]:64523 "EHLO verein.lst.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 09:23:46 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 15:26:46 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Russell King , Linus Torvalds , Robert Love , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] cli()/sti() cleanup, 2.5.27-A2 Message-ID: <20020722152645.A18695@lst.de> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Ingo Molnar , Russell King , Linus Torvalds , Robert Love , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20020722152056.A18619@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from mingo@elte.hu on Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 03:23:40PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 585 Lines: 12 On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 03:23:40PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > i agree mostly, but i do not agree with __irq_save() and irq_save(). > What's wrong with "flags_t irq_save_off()" - the name carries the proper > meaning, and it also harmonizes with irq_off(). but not with irq_restore :) maybe irq_restore_on() although the on is implicit. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/