Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 13:59:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 13:58:50 -0500 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:3844 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 13:58:42 -0500 Subject: Re: Fwd: [Fwd: [PATCH] cs89x0 is not only an ISA card] To: jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com (Jeff Garzik) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 18:29:50 +0000 (GMT) Cc: rmk@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King), J.A.K.Mouw@ITS.TUDelft.NL (Erik Mouw), nico@cam.org (Nicolas Pitre), morton@nortelnetworks.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3A38FC9D.7B2F2B7D@mandrakesoft.com> from "Jeff Garzik" at Dec 14, 2000 12:00:13 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > For an embedded board that supports cs89x0, as you suggest, defining > CONFIG_ISA is a much better option. Or, making cs89x0 dependent on No its completely wrong. You can have a CS89xx series device without the slightest hint of ISA bus. What would be a lot cleaner though would be to build a custom config.in for such embedded devices not referencing the mainstream one - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/