Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 20:45:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 20:45:20 -0400 Received: from moutvdomng0.kundenserver.de ([195.20.224.130]:31457 "EHLO moutvdomng0.schlund.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 20:45:20 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 18:43:09 -0600 (MDT) From: Thunder from the hill X-X-Sender: thunder@hawkeye.luckynet.adm To: Jos Hulzink cc: Adrian Bunk , Alan Cox , Szakacsits Szabolcs , Robert Love , Subject: Re: [PATCH] strict VM overcommit In-Reply-To: <20020721162011.I69041-100000@turtle.stack.nl> Message-ID: X-Location: Dorndorf; Germany MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 927 Lines: 26 Hi, On Sun, 21 Jul 2002, Jos Hulzink wrote: > Maybe it is an option to add the --I_know_Im_stupid option to the swapoff > command line ? (Also known as the --force flag). This way we can both > return an error when the OS lacks memory and force a swapoff. What's wrong with the current behavior? If the system can't live without swap, why forcing it dead? Regards, Thunder -- (Use http://www.ebb.org/ungeek if you can't decode) ------BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK------ Version: 3.12 GCS/E/G/S/AT d- s++:-- a? C++$ ULAVHI++++$ P++$ L++++(+++++)$ E W-$ N--- o? K? w-- O- M V$ PS+ PE- Y- PGP+ t+ 5+ X+ R- !tv b++ DI? !D G e++++ h* r--- y- ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/