Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933062Ab1D0OGv (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:06:51 -0400 Received: from sh.osrg.net ([192.16.179.4]:51025 "EHLO sh.osrg.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933008Ab1D0OGo (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:06:44 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 23:06:00 +0900 To: catalin.marinas@arm.com Cc: arnd@arndb.de, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] ARM DMA mapping TODO, v1 From: FUJITA Tomonori In-Reply-To: References: <201104212129.17013.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20110427230344I.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (sh.osrg.net [192.16.179.4]); Wed, 27 Apr 2011 23:06:02 +0900 (JST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 477 Lines: 7 On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:52:25 +0100 Catalin Marinas wrote: > Anyway, we end up with different DMA ops per device via dev_archdata. Several architectures already do. What's wrong with the approach for arm? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/