Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:55:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:55:44 -0400 Received: from mnh-1-07.mv.com ([207.22.10.39]:64260 "EHLO ccure.karaya.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:55:44 -0400 Message-Id: <200207222002.PAA04143@ccure.karaya.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] UML - part 1 of 2 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 22 Jul 2002 18:38:44 +0100." <20020722183844.A8526@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 15:02:41 -0500 From: Jeff Dike Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 589 Lines: 19 hch@infradead.org said: > The fastcall definition should go into an asm/ header instead of such > hacks.. And I'm supposed to fix this as part of the UML patch? > the disk accounting stuff is also bogus - instead of wasting ram with > huge array it should rather be dynamically-allocated in a per-disk > structure.. And this too? Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/