Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 15:05:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 15:05:30 -0400 Received: from phoenix.mvhi.com ([195.224.96.167]:57607 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 15:05:29 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 20:08:36 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jeff Dike Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] UML - part 1 of 2 Message-ID: <20020722200836.B10041@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Jeff Dike , torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20020722183844.A8526@infradead.org> <200207222002.PAA04143@ccure.karaya.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200207222002.PAA04143@ccure.karaya.com>; from jdike@karaya.com on Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 03:02:41PM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 841 Lines: 24 On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 03:02:41PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote: > hch@infradead.org said: > > The fastcall definition should go into an asm/ header instead of such > > hacks.. > > And I'm supposed to fix this as part of the UML patch? Yes. as part of the XFS merge preparation I'm also fixing generic kernel issues. > > the disk accounting stuff is also bogus - instead of wasting ram with > > huge array it should rather be dynamically-allocated in a per-disk > > structure.. > > And this too? No. but you could just wait for that going in and live without disk statistics for that time.. :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/