Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755107Ab1D2OcI (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:32:08 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:37493 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751123Ab1D2OcF (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:32:05 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:31:45 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , Tony Luck , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , David Ahern , EDAC devel , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] RAS daemon: Easter Eggs Edition Message-ID: <20110429143145.GB10590@elte.hu> References: <1303576100-425-1-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org> <20110429140844.GB1768@nowhere> <20110429142534.GD18746@aftab> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110429142534.GD18746@aftab> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.3.1 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1400 Lines: 34 * Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:08:48AM -0400, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > > If you want to accelerate that, I suggest you cut your patchset into > > smaller sets and focus on merging them piece by piece. Few people are going > > to review 18 patches at once. They may plan to scatter their review over > > days but that doesn't scale well, and it naturally reduces the number of > > reviewers. > > > > You could start with exporting trace things into tools/trace, post the few > > concerned patches and iterate them until everyone is happy. Then switch to > > another subset of the big thing. > > Hi Frederic, > > I can definitely do that. I just wanted to know before I do it though, > whether the general direction is ok and whether people are fine with the > changes, i.e. Arnaldo, Ingo, Peter, Steven, any reactions? If yes, I can get > to work and split the big pile into more digestible pieces. I definitely like the general approach, it's a big step forward from mcelog. Might make sense to progress to the small digestible patches stage to get out the detailed reviews? Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/