Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 17:11:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 17:11:32 -0400 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:14133 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 17:11:30 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 17:14:38 -0400 From: Pete Zaitcev To: Martin Schwidefsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.27: s390 fixes. Message-ID: <20020722171438.A11295@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <200207222100.g6ML0UN08293@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20020722220413.A12952@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020722220413.A12952@infradead.org>; from hch@infradead.org on Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 10:04:13PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 835 Lines: 23 > Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 22:04:13 +0100 > From: Christoph Hellwig > > > * add sys_security system call > > > > I do not see the body of the call in the attached patch. > > Does need to. Is yet another magic dispatcher that has randomly changing > behaviour depending on the linux crap^H^H^H^Hsecurity module loaded. I just realized that it comes from the LSM. Sorry. Why does it need to be added into the architecture and not kept together with the patch-2.5.27-lsm1.gz or such? I am afraid that precludes compilation of architectures without LSM applied. -- Pete - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/