Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 17:49:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 17:49:13 -0400 Received: from 213-96-124-18.uc.nombres.ttd.es ([213.96.124.18]:2037 "HELO dardhal.mired.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 17:49:13 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 23:52:16 +0200 From: Jose Luis Domingo Lopez To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: bug database/webpage Message-ID: <20020722215216.GA12029@localhost> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1025 Lines: 25 On Monday, 22 July 2002, at 15:59:01 -0500, Thomas Molina wrote: > Would something like this be sufficient, or would a full-fledged server be > required? Feedback/comments are welcome > Don't know, but in the process of compiling a 2.5.27 kernel with ALL options enabled I have found not less than 60 compilation bugs. Expect run-time problems to be much more than compile-time problems. Moreover, problems can happen on several kernel versions (untill they are solved), so the page can quickly get out of control. I would suggest categorizing reported bugs to get a smaller front-page, maybe with a back-end database to store and keep track of bugs. Just an opinion :) -- Jose Luis Domingo Lopez Linux Registered User #189436 Debian Linux Woody (Linux 2.4.19-pre6aa1) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/