Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933495Ab1D2ULY (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:11:24 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:44142 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932307Ab1D2ULU (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:11:20 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 22:10:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bruno_Pr=E9mont?= cc: john stultz , sedat.dilek@gmail.com, Mike Galbraith , "Paul E. McKenney" , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Mike Frysinger , KOSAKI Motohiro , LKML , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" , Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: 2.6.39-rc4+: Kernel leaking memory during FS scanning, regression? In-Reply-To: <20110429213100.75f771eb@neptune.home> Message-ID: References: <20110426112756.GF4308@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110426183859.6ff6279b@neptune.home> <20110426190918.01660ccf@neptune.home> <20110427081501.5ba28155@pluto.restena.lu> <20110427204139.1b0ea23b@neptune.home> <20110428102609.GJ2135@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1303997401.7819.5.camel@marge.simson.net> <20110428222301.0b745a0a@neptune.home> <20110428224444.43107883@neptune.home> <1304027480.2971.121.camel@work-vm> <20110429213100.75f771eb@neptune.home> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="8323328-127621749-1304107849=:3005" X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1983 Lines: 50 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-127621749-1304107849=:3005 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Bruno Pr?mont wrote: > On Fri, 29 April 2011 Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, john stultz wrote: > > > On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 23:04 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > /me suspects hrtimer changes to be the real culprit. > > > > > > I'm not seeing anything on right off, but it does smell like > > > e06383db9ec591696a06654257474b85bac1f8cb would be where such an issue > > > would crop up. > > > > > > Bruno, could you try checking out e06383db9ec, confirming it still > > > occurs (and then maybe seeing if it goes away at e06383db9ec^1)? > > > > > > I'll keep digging in the meantime. > > > > I found the bug already. The problem is that sched_init() calls > > init_rt_bandwidth() which calls hrtimer_init() _BEFORE_ > > hrtimers_init() is called. > > > > That was unnoticed so far as the CLOCK id to hrtimer base conversion > > was hardcoded. Now we use a table which is set up at hrtimers_init(), > > so the bandwith hrtimer ends up on CLOCK_REALTIME because the table is > > in the bss. > > > > The patch below fixes this, by providing the table statically rather > > than runtime initialized. Though that whole ordering wants to be > > revisited. > > Works here as well (applied alone), /proc/$(pidof rcu_kthread)/sched shows > total runtime continuing to increase beyond 950 and slubs continue being > released! Does the CPU time show up in top/ps as well now ? Thanks, tglx --8323328-127621749-1304107849=:3005-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/