Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 18:37:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 18:37:02 -0400 Received: from avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.50]:46280 "EHLO avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 18:37:01 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 18:39:10 -0400 To: niv@us.ibm.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [lmbench] tcp bandwidth on athlon Message-ID: <20020722223910.GA1072@rushmore> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: rwhron@earthlink.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1038 Lines: 30 Nivedita Singhvi wrote: > How did your Athlon perform in other tests relative > to these other procs? TCP bandwidth was the only strange really strange result. Side by side lmbench for three processors is at: http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/lmbench_comparison.html > I only see the bitkeeper version thats almost a year old, online, > where is the later version from? The earlier version of bw_tcp is from lmbench-2.0-patch1.tgz and the later version is from lmbench-2.0-patch2.tgz. > Also, any chance you have network stats before/after? I only ran oprofile on the athlon using "localhost". oprofile was to get an idea of the hot functions. oprofile wasn't executing for the lmbench runs in the link above. -- Randy Hron http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/bigbox.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/