Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 19:34:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 19:34:17 -0400 Received: from moutvdom01.kundenserver.de ([195.20.224.200]:32738 "EHLO moutvdomng3.kundenserver.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 19:34:15 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 17:37:04 -0600 (MDT) From: Thunder from the hill X-X-Sender: thunder@hawkeye.luckynet.adm To: Alan Cox cc: Paul Larson , Rik van Riel , lkml , , Subject: Re: [OOPS] 2.5.27 - __free_pages_ok() In-Reply-To: <1027383490.32299.94.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: X-Location: Dorndorf; Germany MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 989 Lines: 30 Hi, On 23 Jul 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > egcs-1.1.2 does have real problems with 2.5 > > 7.1 errata/7.2/7.3 gcc 2.96 appear quite happy So what compiler could I use on my sparc64? IIRC, the current gcc versions failed to make up clean bytecode, and the older versions fail to deal with newer code... I've seen the gcc 3.1 test report from Dave Miller, and I knew it could be nasty times if I try to get used to it... Regards, Thunder -- (Use http://www.ebb.org/ungeek if you can't decode) ------BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK------ Version: 3.12 GCS/E/G/S/AT d- s++:-- a? C++$ ULAVHI++++$ P++$ L++++(+++++)$ E W-$ N--- o? K? w-- O- M V$ PS+ PE- Y- PGP+ t+ 5+ X+ R- !tv b++ DI? !D G e++++ h* r--- y- ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/