Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753388Ab1D3Pe7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Apr 2011 11:34:59 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:40537 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751714Ab1D3Pe4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Apr 2011 11:34:56 -0400 Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 08:34:52 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Alan Cox Cc: Andrew Morton , Jan Kara , LKML Subject: Re: Allow setting of number of raw devices as a module parameter Message-ID: <20110430153452.GA21439@suse.de> References: <1304029469-19672-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> <20110429162817.2eb26efb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20110430112937.06024368@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110430112937.06024368@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1549 Lines: 37 On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 11:29:37AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:28:17 -0700 > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:24:29 +0200 > > Jan Kara wrote: > > > > > Allow setting of maximal number of raw devices as a module parameter. This > > > requires changing of static array into a vmalloced one (the array is going to > > > be too large for kmalloc). > > A large vmalloc array is very antisocial on a 32bit x86 box. It looks > like almost all of it would become sane if there was an array of pointers > to raw devices and the devices were initially allocated on need (even if > for now only recovered on rmmod) In practice, we've never seen a problem with this[1]. Machines that want thousands of raw devices have plenty of memory to handle this situation. I doubt adding the complexity of dynamically allocating the devices as-needed is worth it for the very few systems that ever use this driver, compounded with the fact that we keep saying that this code isn't to be used by "normal" people anyway. thanks, greg k-h [1] Again, this has been shipping for years in SLES kernels with no reported bug reports. I know that's not really a valid reason to do things, but it is a data point for the simplicity of this patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/