Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758050Ab1EAP7v (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 May 2011 11:59:51 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32566 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753305Ab1EAP7t (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 May 2011 11:59:49 -0400 Message-ID: <4DBD8367.6010901@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 12:59:35 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Red Hat/3.1.7-3.el6_0 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Florian Mickler CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, crope@iki.fi, tvboxspy@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] get rid of on-stack dma buffers (part1) References: <1300657852-29318-1-git-send-email-florian@mickler.org> <20110430205405.4beb7d33@schatten.dmk.lab> <4DBC8D9C.2090802@redhat.com> <20110501123851.0ab6b799@schatten.dmk.lab> In-Reply-To: <20110501123851.0ab6b799@schatten.dmk.lab> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1801 Lines: 43 Em 01-05-2011 07:38, Florian Mickler escreveu: > On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 19:30:52 -0300 > Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >> Hi Florian, >> >> Em 30-04-2011 15:54, Florian Mickler escreveu: >>> Hi Mauro! >>> >>> I just saw that you picked up some patches of mine. What about these? >>> These are actually tested... >> >> I'm still in process of applying the pending patches. Due to patchwork.kernel.org >> troubles (including the loss of about 270 patches from its SQL database only >> recovered yesterday[1]), I have a long backlog. So, I'm gradually applying the remaing >> stuff. It will take some time though, and it will depend on patchwork mood, but I intend >> to spend some time during this weekend to minimize the backlog. >> >> >> Cheers, >> Mauro >> >> [1] The recover lost the email's body/SOB, so I've wrote a script to use my email >> queue to get the data, using patchwork just to mark what patches were already >> processed. This increses the time I have to spend on each patch, as I need to run >> a script to match the patchwork patch with the patch ID inside my email queue. >> > > Ah ok, no time pressure over here.. just wanted to make sure > that these don't get lost. I think I've applied your series yesterday. Yet, patchwork is currently at bad mood, and it is not allowing to mark your patches as applied (and the previous series as superseded). I suspect that I'll need to completely abandon patchwork and work on a new way for handling it that doesn't depend (nor will update) patchwork.kernel.org. Mauro. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/