Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758682Ab1EBWT3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2011 18:19:29 -0400 Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.146]:38274 "EHLO e6.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755221Ab1EBWT2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2011 18:19:28 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 15:19:19 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Josh Triplett Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, patches@linaro.org, "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/86] rcu: fix boost-tracing bug and update tracing documentation Message-ID: <20110502221919.GJ2294@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20110501132142.GA25494@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1304256126-26015-17-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110501154310.GD14829@feather> <20110502083301.GY2297@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110502174442.GB24574@feather> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110502174442.GB24574@feather> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1210 Lines: 26 On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 10:44:42AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 01:33:01AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 08:43:10AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > Also, does rcu/rcutorture appear with rcutorture not loaded? Hopefully > > > not, since rcutorture shouldn't take up any additional resources when > > > not loaded. > > > > Not much choice, unfortunately. If I put the info into rcutorture, then > > I lose it when rcutorture is unloaded. This is problematic in automated > > tests that repeatedly load and unload rcutorture. > > > > But the amount of data is small, and I set things up so that TINY_RCU > > can omit this. TREE_RCU is big enough that it doesn't really matter. > > You could omit it entirely if CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST=n (rather than > =m). I could, but it doesn't seem worth it. Of course, it might be just the fact that I am writing this from the Toronto airport... Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/