Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 10:51:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 10:51:45 -0400 Received: from mg03.austin.ibm.com ([192.35.232.20]:60151 "EHLO mg03.austin.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 10:51:44 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Dave Kleikamp To: axel@hh59.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.27: Software Suspend failure / JFS errors Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 09:54:35 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] Cc: jfs-discussion@www-124.southbury.usf.ibm.com References: <20020721122932.GA23552@neon.hh59.org> <20020721144212.GA23767@neon.hh59.org> In-Reply-To: <20020721144212.GA23767@neon.hh59.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200207230954.36039.shaggy@austin.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1802 Lines: 49 On Sunday 21 July 2002 09:42, axel@hh59.org wrote: > This oops occurred during build of gcc.. > Kernel 2.4.19-rc2-ac2. > About the same happens with 2.5.27. I will post an oops of jfsCommit > of 2.5.27 as soon as I get one. I just built gcc on 2.4.19-rc3 + latest JFS and didn't have a problem. I'll repeat it on 2.4.19-rc2-ac2, but there shouldn't be more than a comsmetic difference in the JFS code. I haven't tried 2.5.27 yet. > ksymoops 2.4.5 on i686 2.4.19-rc2-ac2. Options used --- ksymoops output deleted --- > > Trace; c0190800 > Trace; c0118486 > Trace; c0190fb3 > Trace; c01911db > Trace; c0105000 <_stext+0/0> > Trace; c010739e > Trace; c0191080 > > Code; c018b565 > 00000000 <_EIP>: > Code; c018b565 <===== > 0: ff 41 18 incl 0x18(%ecx) <===== > Code; c018b568 > 3: 85 d2 test %edx,%edx It looks like tlck->mp was null in txUpdateMap, and hold_metapage was called with the null pointer. I haven't seen this before, but I am looking at the code to see if I can figure out how it may have happened. I'm guessing that you have built the kernel without CONFIG_JFS_DEBUG set. If I'm right, can you set this before you try to stress JFS again. It may help find the problem earlier. > Regards, > Axel Siebenwirth Thanks, Shaggy -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/