Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 14:57:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 14:57:43 -0400 Received: from handhelds.org ([192.58.209.91]:22486 "HELO handhelds.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 14:57:43 -0400 From: George France To: "Martin Brulisauer" Subject: Re: kbuild 2.5.26 - arch/alpha Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 15:00:50 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jay Estabrook References: <3D3D6B3B.25754.1392D3FD@localhost> <3D3DA7F3.9275.1480075C@localhost> In-Reply-To: <3D3DA7F3.9275.1480075C@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <02072315005002.31958@shadowfax.middleearth> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1719 Lines: 43 On Tuesday 23 July 2002 13:01, Martin Brulisauer wrote: > On 23 Jul 2002, at 11:05, George France wrote: > > that version for a while until it is stable. In the past few months most > > of the efforts have been spent on 2.4.9. Currently there have been > > discussions in regard to: > > > > 1) porting all those patches for 2.4.9 forward to 2.4.[18-19] and 2.5.x. > > I am currently running 2.4.18 from SuSE without any (major) > problems. I found it here: > ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/sf/axp/7.1/RPMS/kernel-source- > 2.4.18.SuSE-0.alpha.rpm. > Then I took arch/alpha/kernel/core_cia.c from version 2.4.12 > (the current version does not run on XLT's booting with MILO; > the latest one is 2.4.12). I have not tried Stefan's 2.4.18 kernel. I am glad to hear that it works for you. I will give it a try. > > 2) taking a look at the latest 2.5.x in the next few weeks, as we are > > aware that 2.5.x does not compile on Alpha. > > Hopefully I can fix core_cia.c to run on XLT's (it's hard to find any > documentation on this toppic) and arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c for > machines booting with linload.exe/MILO because the hwrpb > struct is built by MILO and does not match the one booting from > SRM (eg. empty percpu struct resulting in a cpucount of zero > in /proc/cpuinfo). I am not very familiar with the XLT systems. Maybe Jay can help. He has been working on Alpha systems for a very long time. Jay, do you have any suggestions??? Best Regards, --George - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/