Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 15:49:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 15:49:23 -0400 Received: from RAVEL.CODA.CS.CMU.EDU ([128.2.222.215]:44934 "EHLO ravel.coda.cs.cmu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 15:49:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 15:52:31 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: please DON'T run 2.5.27 with IDE! Message-ID: <20020723195231.GA14288@ravel.coda.cs.cmu.edu> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <3D3D6122.5010207@evision.ag> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D3D6122.5010207@evision.ag> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Jan Harkes Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 966 Lines: 23 On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 03:58:58PM +0200, Marcin Dalecki wrote: > That's actually not true... At least the setting of the > request rq->flags is significantly different here and there. > However I think but I'm not sure that the fact aht we have rq->special > != NULL here has the hidded side effect that we indeed accomplish the > same semantics. > > >And yes it will be useful to move it to block layer. > > Done. Just needs testing. I have at least an ZIP parport drive, which > allows me to do some basic checks. Ehh, you are testing all those IDE changes with a ZIP drive connected to the parallel port? Don't you have any real IDE devices?? I'm sure we can all chip in and buy you a drive if you need one. Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/