Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 16:25:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 16:25:15 -0400 Received: from air-2.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:3712 "EHLO cherise.pdx.osdl.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 16:25:13 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 13:26:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Patrick Mochel X-X-Sender: mochel@cherise.pdx.osdl.net To: Dave Jones cc: Markus Pfeiffer , Subject: Re: CPU detection broken in 2.5.27? In-Reply-To: <20020723212957.B16446@suse.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1853 Lines: 77 On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Dave Jones wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 12:14:08PM -0700, Patrick Mochel wrote: > > There are some problems here. Heh. They've always been there, then. I really did re-add the table from an older arch/i386/kernel/setup.c ;) > > + { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, > [4] is Deschutes according to the docs I used for x86info. Ok, I added it. > > + [5] "Pentium II (Deschutes)", > > What [5] is is dependant upon cache size & stepping. > > stepping 0: > 0KB - Celeron (Covington) > 256KB - Mobile Pentium II (Dixon) > stepping 1-3 Pentium II (Deschutes) The Celeron detection happens in init_intel(). > > + [6] "Mobile Pentium II", > > cache size 128KB - Celeron (Mendocino) Handled in init_intel(). > Stepping 0/5 - Celeron-A Added to init_intel(). > Stepping A - Mobile PII Um, leave as default? > > + [8] "Pentium III (Coppermine)", > > L2 Cachesize == 128 == Celeron (Else P3) Handled in init_intel(). > > + [10] "Pentium III (Cascades)", > > 6a0 is another P2 Deschutes aparently, but this seems > odd, and I should double check this sometime. Leaving unchanged. > > + [11] "Pentium III (Tualatin)", > > Could be a celeron too. Not sure of cache size. Ditto, for the sake of ignorance. > > + [1] "Pentium 4 (Unknown)", > > Model 5 = (Foster) Added. Wait, isn't Foster the one with HT? The ones I have say that they support it, so wouldn't that be a Foster (as well as stepping 5)? Updated patch appended. This updated version hasn't been tested, as I don't have any of those processors at my disposal... -pat - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/