Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 16:32:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 16:32:17 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:12307 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 16:31:46 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 22:34:56 +0200 From: Dave Jones To: Patrick Mochel Cc: Markus Pfeiffer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: CPU detection broken in 2.5.27? Message-ID: <20020723223456.C16446@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Patrick Mochel , Markus Pfeiffer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20020723212957.B16446@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from mochel@osdl.org on Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 01:26:38PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1009 Lines: 33 On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 01:26:38PM -0700, Patrick Mochel wrote: > Heh. They've always been there, then. I really did re-add the table from > an older arch/i386/kernel/setup.c ;) > > The Celeron detection happens in init_intel(). Ah, ok. Then all those cases should magically work.. > Added. Wait, isn't Foster the one with HT? AFAIK yes. Don't have one to test with, so can't say for sure. > The ones I have say that they > support it, so wouldn't that be a Foster (as well as stepping 5)? Which stepping do you have ? > Updated patch appended. This updated version hasn't been tested, as I > don't have any of those processors at my disposal... -ENOAPPENDAGE. Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/