Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932266Ab1EFQyE (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 May 2011 12:54:04 -0400 Received: from mail.vyatta.com ([76.74.103.46]:37668 "EHLO mail.vyatta.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756666Ab1EFQyC (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 May 2011 12:54:02 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 09:53:59 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: TB Cc: "Brandeburg, Jesse" , David Miller , Sangtae Ha , Injong Rhee , "Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu" , "rdunlap@xenotime.net" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp_cubic: limit delayed_ack ratio to prevent divide error Message-ID: <20110506095359.57c4fb38@nehalam> In-Reply-To: <4DC41EB2.6070404@techboom.com> References: <20110504113351.4643a0c9@nehalam> <16668.1304537481@localhost> <20110504123738.7bb4d1ee@nehalam> <20110504.124053.260068550.davem@davemloft.net> <20110504130456.425dee68@nehalam> <4DC41EB2.6070404@techboom.com> Organization: Vyatta X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.0; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1443 Lines: 37 On Fri, 06 May 2011 12:15:46 -0400 TB wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11-05-04 04:53 PM, Brandeburg, Jesse wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 4 May 2011, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > >> TCP Cubic keeps a metric that estimates the amount of delayed > >> acknowledgements to use in adjusting the window. If an abnormally > >> large number of packets are acknowledged at once, then the update > >> could wrap and reach zero. This kind of ACK could only > >> happen when there was a large window and huge number of > >> ACK's were lost. > >> > >> This patch limits the value of delayed ack ratio. The choice of 32 > >> is just a conservative value since normally it should be range of > >> 1 to 4 packets. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger > > > > patch seems fine, but please credit the reporter (lkml@techboom.com) with > > reporting the issue with logs, maybe even with Reported-by: and some kind > > of reference to the panic message or the email thread in the text or > > header? > > We're currently testing the patch on 6 production servers Thank you, is there some regularity to the failures previously? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/