Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753680Ab1EFX5f (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 May 2011 19:57:35 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:50074 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753008Ab1EFX5M (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 May 2011 19:57:12 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 16:55:44 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mu=F1oz?= Cc: Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: sm7xx: Use kernel framebuffer mode setting Message-ID: <20110506235544.GC22803@suse.de> References: <1304702696-9403-1-git-send-email-jmunhoz@igalia.com> <20110506212207.GA3222@kroah.com> <4DC475A9.8070701@igalia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4DC475A9.8070701@igalia.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1807 Lines: 48 On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 12:26:49AM +0200, Javier Mu?oz wrote: > On 05/06/2011 11:22 PM, Greg KH wrote: > >On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 07:24:56PM +0200, Javier M. Mellid wrote: > >>This patch implements dynamic framebuffer mode setting. > >> > >>Previous code works with mode setting in a hard code way. Previous hard > >>code configuration is used as default configuration if dynamic mode > >>setting or boot mode setting (via sm712vga_setup) is not used. > >> > >>Tested with SM712 supporting 1024x600x16 as default hardware resolution. > >> > >>Changes: > >> > >>- Implement fb_check_var and fb_set_par callbacks > >>- Remove __maybe_unused decorator in function being used (sm712vga_setup) > >>- Minor cleanup on initialization structs related with mode settings > >>- Updated author copyright > >>- Updated TODO file > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Javier M. Mellid > >>--- > >> drivers/staging/sm7xx/TODO | 1 - > > > >This applies with fuzz, this leads me to believe that you didn't test > >this on the latest linux-next tree, right? > > > >What did you make this patch against? > > Sorry, I didn't know. I made this patch against > linux-2.6 (bfd412db9e7b0d8f7b9c09d12d07aa2ac785f1d0) as I did with > previous patches. > > Testing was about creating, applying, compiling and running patch > with kernel built from linux-2.6 > > Do you need a new patch against linux-next's master? I can redo this patch. Yes, please always make patches against linux-next as it includes any other pending patches that are in my tree. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/