Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 20:49:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 20:49:24 -0400 Received: from harpo.it.uu.se ([130.238.12.34]:60858 "EHLO harpo.it.uu.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 20:49:24 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 02:52:32 +0200 (MET DST) From: Mikael Pettersson Message-Id: <200207240052.CAA16441@harpo.it.uu.se> To: davej@suse.de, mochel@osdl.org Subject: Re: CPU detection broken in 2.5.27? Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, profmakx@profmakx.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 928 Lines: 21 On Tue, 23 Jul 2002 14:08:52 -0700 (PDT), Patrick Mochel wrote: >> I meant ->x86_model there, I assume you did too, and you have a 0xF24/0xF27 cpu. >> I wasn't aware these were HT aware. In fact, only 0xF50 are confirmed. >> Interesting. > >Actually, it's Family 15, Model 1, Stepping 2. Though the HT capability >shows up, it's disabled, so it's one of the pre-Foster P4s (though I don't >know what they're called). cpuid 0xF12 is a standard Willamette core P4; I have one heating my room :-) Model 2 should be Northwood, AFAIK. But why the table? Aren't you using the extended cpuid levels and/or the BrandID to get the names for cpuid 0x680 (coppermine) and above cpus? /Mikael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/