Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 00:47:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 00:47:27 -0400 Received: from adsl-66-136-199-175.dsl.austtx.swbell.net ([66.136.199.175]:21636 "HELO digitalroadkill.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 00:47:26 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.4.19rc2aa1 VM too aggressive? From: Austin Gonyou To: Rik van Riel Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Johannes Erdfelt , David Rees , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1027486143.32523.2.camel@UberGeek.digitalroadkill.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.1.0.99 (Preview Release) Date: 23 Jul 2002 23:49:03 -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 860 Lines: 23 On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 19:21, Rik van Riel wrote: ... > > if the app allocates and frees 150MB of shm per second that's what the > > kernel has to show you. > > Indeed, though I have to comment that that's rather interesting > web server software ;) I agree, but I'm not sure what else could be causing it, unless vmstat is not calculating values correctly, like off by 1 values or something. I take a look at my local box, not the same has his test environment, but still, 512MB and Apache. I'll see what I can see, maybe we can shed *some* light on this. :) > Rik -- Austin Gonyou - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/