Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752381Ab1EIP3q (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2011 11:29:46 -0400 Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:54027 "EHLO out2.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751272Ab1EIP3p (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2011 11:29:45 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: hVO4Q3Y2ou4PRuqdj6kYDWe/3JdNkdLC7X+JDqF1buUw 1304954983 Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 12:29:41 -0300 From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh To: Andrew Lutomirski Cc: ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Anton Vorontsov , David Woodhouse , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] [RFC] Controlling the ThinkPad battery charger Message-ID: <20110509152941.GD13275@khazad-dum.debian.net> References: <20110509144546.GB13275@khazad-dum.debian.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1024D/1CDB0FE3 5422 5C61 F6B7 06FB 7E04 3738 EE25 DE3F 1CDB 0FE3 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1777 Lines: 35 On Mon, 09 May 2011, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > The SBS interface exposes more data about the battery, including > > per-cell-group voltage and pack microcontroller aging counters, alarms, and > > the "needs to get through the fuel-gaugue reset procedure" semasphore. > > If I'm feeling really motivated, I'll look at that. I'm currently > more interested in the charging thresholds, though, which I think is > independent of the choice of SBS vs ACPI to access the battery state. > (From a quick glance at the SBS spec, you can inhibit charging > entirely but you can't ask for thresholds. I assume that the EC takes > care of that. If I'm wrong, please tell me, but SMAPI seems like a > fine way to access the thresholds.) Yeah, SMAPI is the safest way to deal with all this. It is an interface layer that Lenovo is not fond of breaking (or touches very rarely. Amounts to the same in the end). SBS does not take care of thresholds, indeed. The EC does (and I know how to program the threshold in a few models, if you do want to test it in your X220, I can send you the information. It is safe to test if you use it together with SMAPI to cross-check). The SBS ACPI interface would be useful to provide a single driver that can replace the ACPI battery one to deliver full functionality in one place. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/