Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755880Ab1EIX3i (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2011 19:29:38 -0400 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.152]:56663 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755129Ab1EIX3h (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2011 19:29:37 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Consolidate i8253 clocksource From: John Stultz To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: LKML , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Ralf Baechle In-Reply-To: <20110509132738.GB16919@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20110509132738.GB16919@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 16:29:22 -0700 Message-ID: <1304983762.2939.39.camel@work-vm> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 741 Lines: 22 On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 14:27 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > Three architectures have an i8253 PIT clocksource, and each duplicates > the code for this. The initial patch extracts a common implementation > to drivers/clocksource, and subsequent patches convert each architecture > to use this copy. Very cool! The series looks good to me. Although maybe should we get rid of the inb_p redefinitions in a later cleanup? Acked-by: John Stultz thanks -john -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/