Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932762Ab1EJIog (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2011 04:44:36 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:40988 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756131Ab1EJIoc (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2011 04:44:32 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 10:44:10 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Steven Rostedt , David Sharp , Vaibhav Nagarnaik , Michael Rubin , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel , Frederic Weisbecker , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Christoph Hellwig , Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: Fix powerTOP regression with 2.6.39-rc5 Message-ID: <20110510084410.GD27426@elte.hu> References: <1304713252.25414.2532.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20110507065803.GA23414@elte.hu> <1304765110.25414.2564.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20110507144402.GC2859@elte.hu> <1304788829.11129.57.camel@frodo> <20110507190033.GA11465@elte.hu> <1304996847.2969.151.camel@frodo> <20110510080918.GB27426@elte.hu> <4DC8F831.2010404@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DC8F831.2010404@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.3.1 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2004 Lines: 50 * Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On > >>name: sched_switch > >>ID: 57 > >>format: > >> field:unsigned short common_type; offset:0; size:2; > >> field:unsigned char common_flags; offset:2; size:1; > >> field:unsigned char common_preempt_count; offset:3; size:1; > >> field:int common_pid; offset:4; size:4; > >> field:int common_lock_depth; offset:8; size:4; > >> > >> field:char prev_comm[TASK_COMM_LEN]; offset:12; size:16; > >> field:pid_t prev_pid; offset:28; size:4; > >> field:int prev_prio; offset:32; size:4; > >> field:long prev_state; offset:40; size:8; > >> field:char next_comm[TASK_COMM_LEN]; offset:48; size:16; > >> field:pid_t next_pid; offset:64; size:4; > >> field:int next_prio; offset:68; size:4; > >> > >>Is equivalent to this: > >> > >> > >>Eventsschedfunction_graph/tmp/trace.dat > >I did not say that it's equivalent, i said it's XML look-alike. > > > >Steve, we even joked about that, that if we continue like this we'll end up > >with an XML parser ... I requested several changes to the description format so > >that it becomes more human readable. > > frankly, for software, XML is easier to deal with than the human > readable form. Yes, absolutely - still i think keeping it human readable is important. > if we are serious about wanting software to parse this stuff.. maybe exposing > it in an easy to parse format as well is not a bad idea.... Well, the code to parse it intelligently already exists so i dont think we are forced to go back to some harder to read (and easier to parse) format. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/