Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 12:07:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 12:07:38 -0400 Received: from dial249.pm3abing3.abingdonpm.naxs.com ([216.98.75.249]:2954 "EHLO ani.animx.eu.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 12:07:36 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 12:19:53 -0400 From: Wakko Warner To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: DAC960 Bitrot Message-ID: <20020724121953.B20482@animx.eu.org> References:

<20020711100828.GE808@suse.de> <20020724143931.GG5159@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i In-Reply-To: <20020724143931.GG5159@suse.de>; from Jens Axboe on Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 04:39:31PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 911 Lines: 18 > Well not really, DAC960 is still using the default per-major queues. But > switching to per-device queue would definitely be a Really Good Idea. > The only changes I did to this driver where trivial conversions in the > 2.5.1-pre days, in fact even before multi-page bio's existed. This, I'd like to make a suggestion which actually doesn't pertain to the original thread, but since this is being read, I thought it would be a good place. Why not add a configure option to disable firmware checking? I have a few cards here with firmware 2.x x < 73 and they work fine (disabled the check). -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/