Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754583Ab1EKPoH (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 May 2011 11:44:07 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:40744 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751799Ab1EKPoE (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 May 2011 11:44:04 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=Elg0Oa9nf+sh/sJ9r2ym2feecliXzKSFaW1eB0YZgGBBvbqbH9F+TNOGxbVX0sfGU0 F2VGryEL+YmxcMGcIMG0cep/3dd1uvxbOWWiE2fWTYBuGdbbuLtmb1R0VxQxJyXdKW/q NMFPrw1r5g+Cf91si1ts5ZmLWTuXPVRw3GhtE= From: Jason Stubbs To: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform: fix samsung brightness min/max calculations Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 14:47:49 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.38-gentoo-r3; KDE/4.6.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <201104201358.50443.jasonbstubbs@gmail.com> <201104281855.50572.jasonbstubbs@gmail.com> <20110510223908.GA16989@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20110510223908.GA16989@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201105111447.49816.jasonbstubbs@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1203 Lines: 27 On Wed, 11 May 2011 08:39:08 Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 06:55:50PM +1000, Jason Stubbs wrote: > > Not sure of the "bump" process, so I'll just go over each part of the > > patch. > > > > Note that all the changes only affect the sabi_config where > > min_brightness is 1 so you might not see in difference on your hardware. > > This isn't needed anymore due to your other patch superseeding it, > right? Actually, this one is irrelevant to the nc210/nc110 support as that laptop uses the "SwSmi@" sabi. It was just something I noticed while learning the code. The miscalculations will only affect any laptops that use the "SECLINUX" sabi but I tested it by setting min_brightness to 2 for my laptop. The patch doesn't apply cleanly on top of the nc210/nc110 patch though as they both modify set_brightness(). It might apply with a higher fuzz factor as the changes don't actually clash. Should I redo the patch? Regards, Jason Stubbs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/