Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 13:20:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 13:20:45 -0400 Received: from syndetix.com ([204.134.124.201]:25577 "HELO zianet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 13:20:44 -0400 Message-ID: <3D3EE4B1.3000809@zianet.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 11:32:33 -0600 From: kwijibo@zianet.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020723 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Hahn CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 3com 3c996b-t support? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1132 Lines: 37 It is just that I was reading this page where they evaluate gigi cards and they used the drivers from 3com. http://www.cs.uni.edu/~gray/gig-over-copper/ The 3com drivers are open-source though, which makes me less hesitent. And the tigon3 drivers lack of documentation kind of irks me. I would however like to stick with a mainstream kernel driver cause the support is there if it is needed. I guess I will give both versions a whirl. From just glancing at the source of both, it seems that both versions support jumbo frames which is really what I am after. Steve Mark Hahn wrote: >>drivers out and found out which performs better? Should I >>stick with what 3com provides or go with what is in the kernel >>if it works? >> >> > >several good kernel hackers maintain, tune and polish the kernel versions. >I wouldn't even consider the stuff from the vendor. > > > > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/