Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932498Ab1ELSqz (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2011 14:46:55 -0400 Received: from smtp108.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com ([76.13.13.47]:21548 "HELO smtp108.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1757667Ab1ELSqx (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2011 14:46:53 -0400 X-Yahoo-SMTP: _Dag8S.swBC1p4FJKLCXbs8NQzyse1SYSgnAbY0- X-YMail-OSG: gf20SVsVM1mCmSGgIRPolRoUREbtKn2zsl8WU9KFjRPR415 gNsS89UVZAPcV6dHNgnuDn0uvwkNLydTfE4vqjV8CugU7MnCWQ.L6HqtQ2Um TilxFKG5fkEhMNvI5Sd1yytIS1ltJ2MtUXAtf2CupSyzsoY6IkMxkxGjnz8r UdKzzhm1ikmQdWpPsmn3U4.XAOjxtt9T4PK8zCqfljyU8l.ZeL7YR7S.3D1B PCc86PiQh8MW3aJ1jjRBXYWTqrknbkXdyAySbyGS41fcCLJYC7eAsDvxKLho ClZB1OFqFbewIIelMLIjGC5nRYvaWde7vUHUfmVf5dcOgXThG X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 13:46:48 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@router.home To: James Bottomley cc: Pekka Enberg , Mel Gorman , Andrew Morton , Colin King , Raghavendra D Prabhu , Jan Kara , Chris Mason , Rik van Riel , Johannes Weiner , linux-fsdevel , linux-mm , linux-kernel , linux-ext4 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: slub: Default slub_max_order to 0 In-Reply-To: <1305225467.2575.66.camel@mulgrave.site> Message-ID: References: <1305127773-10570-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <1305127773-10570-4-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <1305213359.2575.46.camel@mulgrave.site> <1305214993.2575.50.camel@mulgrave.site> <1305215742.27848.40.camel@jaguar> <1305225467.2575.66.camel@mulgrave.site> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 875 Lines: 20 On Thu, 12 May 2011, James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 18:55 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 10:43 -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > > > However, since you admit even you see problems, let's concentrate on > > > fixing them rather than recriminations? > > > > Yes, please. So does dropping max_order to 1 help? > > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER is set to 3 in 2.6.39-rc7. > > Just booting with max_slab_order=1 (and none of the other patches > applied) I can still get the machine to go into kswapd at 99%, so it > doesn't seem to make much of a difference. slub_max_order=1 right? Not max_slab_order. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/