Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758742Ab1ELVQA (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2011 17:16:00 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:59671 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758698Ab1ELVP6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2011 17:15:58 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=Bs3a+JLtHkS7jcBbqR7M7uDxcu4ma0gj7pINPkM2CUX28jXDMyrq6L9K95PNrhtV2h M+zzFotRNK/NJK+6375CBUYc+r8mgFCTgkdAlqXvp1IF+jB2a+K3TFjZSl+KR6hBuJlZ lRXT5YALGVJVzKwrUITp131p4x63ZGIMuU/TM= Subject: Re: Kernel crash after using new Intel NIC (igb) From: Eric Dumazet To: Arun Sharma Cc: Maximilian Engelhardt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, StuStaNet Vorstand In-Reply-To: <20110512211033.GA3468@dev1756.snc6.facebook.com> References: <201104250033.03401.maxi@daemonizer.de> <1303878240.2699.41.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1303878771.2699.44.camel@edumazet-laptop> <201104271352.00601.maxi@daemonizer.de> <20110512211033.GA3468@dev1756.snc6.facebook.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 23:15:53 +0200 Message-ID: <1305234953.2831.2.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 948 Lines: 27 Le jeudi 12 mai 2011 à 14:10 -0700, Arun Sharma a écrit : > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 01:51:59PM +0200, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote: > > > > thank you for this information. I updated the kernel of the affected server to > > version 2.6.38.4 yesterday. I'll report when there are still crashes, but it > > might take a while, as in the past they only happened within the interval of > > weeks to month. > > I've seen this panic on 2.6.38.y as well. It's rare (< 1%), but the > panic consistently happens at the same place. > > Are any of the inetpeer.c commits in the 2.6.39 tree, which are not in -stable yet, > good candidates to try? > Probably not. What gives slub_nomerge=1 for you ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/