Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 20:12:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 20:12:23 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-5-cust12.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.121.12]:46073 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 20:12:22 -0400 Subject: Re: is flock broken in 2.4 or 2.5 kernels or what does this mean? From: Alan Cox To: David Ford Cc: "J.A. Magallon" , John Covici , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3D3ED0E4.9020902@blue-labs.org> References: <1027441872.31787.139.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20020723214410.GA3249@werewolf.able.es> <3D3ED0E4.9020902@blue-labs.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 25 Jul 2002 02:28:41 +0100 Message-Id: <1027560521.6456.40.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 620 Lines: 14 On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 17:08, David Ford wrote: > (Alan) > Actually I posted a "is sendmail on crack?" question last month when > 8.12.5 was released and this was in the release notes. We got a bunch > of confirmations that Linux flock() was broken due to the accounting. Thanks. I now have the original discussion, the demonstration and a patch Andrea believes fixes it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/