Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759042Ab1ENUeL (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 May 2011 16:34:11 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:56223 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754508Ab1ENUeF (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 May 2011 16:34:05 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] Consolidate CONFIG_DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 18:55:09 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.37; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arjan van de Ven , Helge Deller , Heiko Carstens , Stephen Rothwell , Chris Metcalf References: <1305244212-19183-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <1305244212-19183-10-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: <1305244212-19183-10-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201105131855.10195.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:g61RLMrGU1mKM4aHxupBlIjsa/KSkz0G0/YtTZ/pBsG 4UQVA4wfVIiXoJUKXmAJ+ArOzyECG6Ub2k6pYOL9SClvrrrBca MmBnOF10yA4VzLVuIWIR2TG1YKbL89+aRFWSJEiH3TxPE8dz00 2Ykvqev/u/0vPux0a1xPZrbmm7QwwjJ9nvuzdxB8v29/gcMlnF KnPMDqTQmepRRoNF+ByVw== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1746 Lines: 42 On Friday 13 May 2011, Stephen Boyd wrote: > The help text for this config is duplicated across the x86, > parisc, and s390 Kconfig.debug files. Arnd Bergman noted that the > help text was slightly misleading and should be fixed to state > that enabling this option isn't a problem when using pre 4.4 gcc. > > To simplify the rewording, consolidate the text into > lib/Kconfig.debug and modify it there to be more explicit about > when you should say N to this config. > > Also, make the text a bit more generic by stating that this > option enables compile time checks so we can cover architectures > which emit warnings vs. ones which emit errors. The details of > how an architecture decided to implement the checks isn't as > important as the concept of compile time checking of > copy_from_user() calls. > > While we're doing this, remove all the copy_from_user_overflow() > code that's duplicated many times and place it into lib/ so that > any architecture supporting this option can get the function for > free. > > Cc: Arnd Bergmann > Cc: x86@kernel.org > Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Arjan van de Ven > Cc: Helge Deller > Cc: Heiko Carstens > Cc: Stephen Rothwell > Cc: Chris Metcalf > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd Thanks for following up on this Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/