Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758555Ab1ENQ2b (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 May 2011 12:28:31 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:45587 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753449Ab1ENQ23 (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 May 2011 12:28:29 -0400 Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 18:28:26 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: John Kacur cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: merge of real-time 2.6.33.9-rt31 with stable 2.6.33.13 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 846 Lines: 24 On Sat, 14 May 2011, John Kacur wrote: > I did some light testing merging 2.6.33.13 into real-time 2.6.33.9-rt31. > In addition I cherry-picked 3c955b407a084810f57260d61548cc92c14bc627 > in order to compile on newer distros. Thanks. > Here is the result of cyclic test on one machine > sudo ./cyclictest -t32 -p 80 -n -i 10000 -l 10000 > policy: fifo: loadavg: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1/541 3759 > > T: 0 ( 3728) P:80 I:10000 C: 10000 Min: 7 Act: 104 Avg: 114 Max: 470 The numbers are weird. How does that compare to older kernels on that machine with the same test? Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/