Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759055Ab1ENVAU (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 May 2011 17:00:20 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:52738 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754794Ab1ENVAR (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 May 2011 17:00:17 -0400 From: Ben Hutchings To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Nikola Ciprich , Faidon Liambotis , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Herv=E9?= Commowick , Randy Dunlap , Greg KH , Apollon Oikonomopoulos , chronidev@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <20110514204536.GA16496@1wt.eu> References: <20110428082625.GA23293@pcnci.linuxbox.cz> <20110428183434.GG30645@1wt.eu> <20110429100200.GB23293@pcnci.linuxbox.cz> <20110430093605.GA10529@1wt.eu> <20110430173905.GA25641@tty.gr> <20110430201436.GF10529@1wt.eu> <20110514190423.GA2264@nik-comp.lan> <20110514204536.GA16496@1wt.eu> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-o/Id6A680A5jTXD8JWg4" Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 21:59:53 +0100 Message-ID: <1305406793.4065.466.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:470:1f08:1539:21c:bfff:fe03:f805 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk Subject: Re: 2.6.32.21 - uptime related crashes? X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2057 Lines: 56 --=-o/Id6A680A5jTXD8JWg4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 22:45 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi, >=20 > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 09:04:23PM +0200, Nikola Ciprich wrote: > > Hello gentlemans, > > Nicolas, thanks for further report, it contradicts my theory that probl= em occured somewhere during 2.6.32.16. >=20 > Well, I'd like to be sure what kernel we're talking about. Nicolas said > "2.6.32.8 Debian Kernel", but I suspect it's "2.6.32-8something" instead. > Nicolas, could you please report the exact version as indicated by "uname= -a" ? [...] Actually you need to use 'cat /proc/version' (or dpkg) to get the full version. Ben. --=20 Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. --=-o/Id6A680A5jTXD8JWg4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUATc7tQ+e/yOyVhhEJAQrJdA/+JHRru6s3el6/Bwa0TabO0PRxs8koKu/o rSdfiq1LqL++E4YMdBfcsDgZZ1301ZcZ6Kom158dC6woXLo/NFvc/T+NQ1HJOrTm dbmHZ9b9z38Qk9BLzBHBxDUafZzOPFftwmqYHE0HpdXmmDlIpWuN9ucmtA6cLVTW COpV5qC3RZViXPoEMajzpemLB2ympsegJKJZv+F7OBU07iypBjGt7EDT+XO4qhFm YNFq8/Z5duboMGNPh1IORsCqVl2YRZn8WeuK613zED0UFutR4Xo2UsrkGFsmyu2A xFqvtRylflM4jkNTWJl5W22Ra7E3GNmym/Vf0IQwuioptpQuw/Y63KXHy01Oiapg gUs2FLwArR/b70Y/no3aBNtjKPqs6BsPdccNGATD6ZCA8MQ8tFC6SyYWl1drofPD QNKcezosK6AY58FQJ0/ciQQ6TqMv4S/NnVxjb4DmCb61eBbOgBoBnghTMNi9U1T7 127GJLYIXHv6OOLH+ZNBF/FPlqB0niGWr6WWifotKCY7lxpZLHnW3VBiyfPXAGvA FPSDUDbrHUHpC8Dj8e/3JWXm7Mg5206STZ+86g52j8nkKPlXbfZKm8Z5XjBBfuw1 X6Xm8SLph+cibEXj7zDhcnbVuPDRBMMQGsz9d4noPuZfuEkBSEFq4xV4zLvYd7h0 jP1IZ/5Q2Hg= =Qaux -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-o/Id6A680A5jTXD8JWg4-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/