Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754005Ab1EPJtB (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 May 2011 05:49:01 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:40458 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753430Ab1EPJtA convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 May 2011 05:49:00 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=hQp1YgdovbYmMj5xxb+XHWYIE67vdTRFAQu/QC/D8h6m01Jg44uoHw1kyrtMuCxv4e EcpGDgYhplXHuUvHbz6sWIG/ayTP8uM9euo0qR0xMwskzBSY7TiFMGTJIQQDjGmGUfcl ArVK95naOCDd7gRd8mBVj/c8F1+/+auQxp69Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110516090355.GA12325@elte.hu> References: <20110513180449.562138524@sbsiddha-MOBL3.sc.intel.com> <20110513181008.859892593@sbsiddha-MOBL3.sc.intel.com> <20110516080844.GC27635@elte.hu> <20110516090355.GA12325@elte.hu> Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 13:48:59 +0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: igWwKy0oY0MzNagWfbk-Sr_S5Fg Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch 1/5] x84_64, apic: Use probe routines to simplify apic selection From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov , Suresh Siddha , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "steiner@sgi.com" , "yinghai@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1030 Lines: 26 ok, thanks Ingo. On Monday, May 16, 2011, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > >> ? Yes, this should be a cleaner step but it requires some more code churn >> that is why I think Suresh' approach is pretty well done! Ingo, probably we >> could do so on *top* of this changes as only time permits? The problem is >> that I personally can't guarantee I continue working on the task this week, >> if Suresh is able to -- this would be great, if not -- probably even such >> minimal disturbing patch worth merging, it definitley makes code better I >> think ;) > > We can do it on top, but within the series please. The APIC mess is not > improving so we only want to merge features that are done cleanly. > > Thanks, > > ? ? ? ?Ingo > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/