Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 05:25:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 05:25:51 -0400 Received: from B5230.pppool.de ([213.7.82.48]:29704 "EHLO nicole.de.interearth.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 05:25:50 -0400 Subject: Re: Linux-2.5.28 From: Daniel Egger To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Kernel Mailing List , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-u4NRQCKf8yo0JZAnXUJJ" X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.7 Date: 25 Jul 2002 11:21:00 +0200 Message-Id: <1027588861.12730.11.camel@sonja.de.interearth.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2460 Lines: 74 --=-u4NRQCKf8yo0JZAnXUJJ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Don, 2002-07-25 um 03.08 schrieb Linus Torvalds: > > So IDE-101 equals to the small snippet of code pasted somewhere in the > > evil flamewar? =20 > Have you _looked_ at the full changelog? Apparently not. I was merely requesting a bit more verbose information in your regular changelog, the whole thing is quite exhaustive but this entry didn't really fit and contained no useful information at all. I will definitely consider reading the "full changelog" although I cannot remember having read anything about such a thing before this thread. =20 > The snippet was posted as part of the IDE-2.5.27 thread. Go look for it > yourself. Exactly what I said, no? > Most of the IDE stuff is FUD and misinformation. I've run every single > 2.5.x kernel on an IDE system ("penguin.transmeta.com" has everything on > IDE), and the main reported 2.5.27 corruption was actually from my BK tre= e > apparently due to the IRQ handling changes. This is very encouraging information that had been missing from the threads at all: a success story from a person actually trusting und using this thing. > The thing I dislike is how people who apparently haven't even read the > discussions, and didn't bother to look up the full changelog feel that > they are perfectly fine to spread FUD and misinformation about the IDE > layer. I for one did read the discussion(s) but it's really hard to map IDE-101 to some tiny patch in a huge tree of mails. > Do we have issues there? Yes. But there are actually _more_ problems with > people dissing the work than with the code itself. I appreciate Martins work and even more your word on it that it's pretty stable.=20 Keep on the good work and let us end this thread for good. --=20 Servus, Daniel --=-u4NRQCKf8yo0JZAnXUJJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA9P8L8chlzsq9KoIYRAoCvAJ4l63b9QCo4cxbT+7Y62eLobplAIgCg1uyZ UrJSk90EiA6pFKtnoxjgMa0= =b/vN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-u4NRQCKf8yo0JZAnXUJJ-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/