Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754457Ab1EQL4o (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 May 2011 07:56:44 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:56592 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753939Ab1EQL4m (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 May 2011 07:56:42 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 13:56:14 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, John Stultz , Jacob Pan , Glauber Costa , Dimitri Sivanich , Rusty Russell , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Chris McDermott , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree Message-ID: <20110517115614.GG13475@elte.hu> References: <20110513092646.GK13647@elte.hu> <20110513213640.GB30539@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110516073144.GF24836@elte.hu> <20110516074230.GI30539@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110516091744.GB12325@elte.hu> <20110516091927.GK30539@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110516094056.GA25039@elte.hu> <20110516100750.GN30539@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110516110652.GC19837@elte.hu> <20110516113707.GQ30539@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110516113707.GQ30539@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.3.1 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1756 Lines: 45 * Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 01:06:52PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:40:56AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > maintainers (and not assume lack of ack after 24 hours means acceptance), or > > > > > > Wrong, 72 to 96 hours. Sunday to Wednesday/Thursday. > > > > Not that this is really material (the argument is pretty much the same even had > > you waited 3 days), but you are already wrong about the 'Sunday' part, because > > you posted it to lkml on *Monday* 13:27 GMT: > > > > Message-ID: <20110509132738.GB16919@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> > > Mon, 9 May 2011 09:27:52 -0400 > > Sigh. So you're only looking at the _second_ posting of them, not the first. > > Here's the message, minus the patch. > > | Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 19:24:07 +0100 > | From: Russell King - ARM Linux > | To: Ralf Baechle , John Stultz , > | "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar > | Subject: i8253 clocksource consolidation > | Message-ID: <20110508182407.GN27807@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> > | > | Ralf, John, Ingo, hpa, I did not get that mail, at all. It's not in my spam mbox either. This pretty much explains why you assumed us informed and should explain to you why i was surprised by your way of handling the patch :-) Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/