Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932352Ab1EQVMf (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 May 2011 17:12:35 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:26119 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932296Ab1EQVMe (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 May 2011 17:12:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 17:12:23 -0400 From: Dave Jones To: Linus Walleij Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Linus Walleij , Samuel Ortiz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] mach-ux500: update and move cpufreq driver Message-ID: <20110517211223.GA1909@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Linus Walleij , Arnd Bergmann , Linus Walleij , Samuel Ortiz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones References: <1304687191-23814-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> <201105061522.33179.arnd@arndb.de> <20110510055926.GA2747@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1575 Lines: 40 On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:02:14AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > 2011/5/10 Dave Jones : > > > Haven't had chance to really read much patches the last few days > > (travelling until the 16th). ?Due to the patch collisions we'll keep > > seeing on kconfig/Makefiles, should these go via the cpufreq tree, > > or do people want to still push them through their respective arch trees ? > > I pushed a patch series yesterday that basically deactivates the > cpufreq driver in the mach-ux500, moves it over to drivers/cpufreq, > updates it, then reactivates it in the new place with a patch to > the Makefile. Just got back from travelling, so I'm buried under mail backlog right now. The only one that jumped out was the one I was cc'd on ([PATCH 10/10] mach-ux500: update and move cpufreq driver). > Of these changes only the last patch will collide with your tree, > so I pushed all of them except that one to linux-next. > > The last patch I plan to submit to Torvalds directly after both > trees have gone into the merge window. > > Can you please look into this and ACK the patches if they > seem OK? The patch that moves the driver over looked ok to me, so feel free to add my acked-by to it. >From the look of things, the Kconfig is staying under arch/arm for now ? thanks, Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/