Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932314Ab1EQXok (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 May 2011 19:44:40 -0400 Received: from e37.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.158]:41978 "EHLO e37.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932193Ab1EQXoj (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 May 2011 19:44:39 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/6 net-next] netdevice.h: Add zero-copy flag in netdevice From: Shirley Ma To: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_Miros=C5=82aw?= Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Ben Hutchings , David Miller , Eric Dumazet , Avi Kivity , Arnd Bergmann , netdev@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <1305574128.3456.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1305574518.2885.25.camel@bwh-desktop> <1305574680.3456.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1305575253.2885.28.camel@bwh-desktop> <20110516211459.GE18148@redhat.com> <1305588738.3456.65.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1305671318.10756.49.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 16:44:25 -0700 Message-ID: <1305675865.10756.63.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 (2.28.3-1.fc12) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1591 Lines: 45 On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 00:58 +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote: > W dniu 18 maja 2011 00:28 użytkownik Shirley Ma > napisał: > > On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 23:48 +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote: > >> 2011/5/17 Shirley Ma : > >> > Looks like to use a new flag requires more time/work. I am > thinking > >> > whether we can just use HIGHDMA flag to enable zero-copy in > macvtap > >> to > >> > avoid the new flag for now since mavctap uses real NICs as lower > >> device? > >> > >> Is there any other restriction besides requiring driver to not > recycle > >> the skb? Are there any drivers that recycle TX skbs? > > Not more other restrictions, skb clone is OK. pskb_expand_head() > looks > > OK to me from code review. > > > Currently there is no drivers recycle TX skbs. > > So why do you require the target device to have some flags at all? We could use macvtap to check lower device HIGHDMA to enable zero-copy, but I am not sure whether it is sufficient. If it's sufficient then we don't need to use a new flag here. To be safe, it's better to use a new flag to enable each device who can pass zero-copy test. > Do I understand correctly, that this zero-copy feature is about > packets received from VMs? Yes, packets sent from VMs, and received in local host for TX zero-copy here. Thanks Shirley -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/