Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S129325AbQLOBMk>; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 20:12:40 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S135413AbQLOBMb>; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 20:12:31 -0500
Received: from enterprise.cistron.net ([195.64.68.33]:27400 "EHLO
	enterprise.cistron.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S129325AbQLOBMS>; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 20:12:18 -0500
From: miquels@traveler.cistron-office.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg)
Subject: Re: Signal 11
Date: 15 Dec 2000 00:42:02 GMT
Organization: Cistron Internet Services B.V.
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <91bpcq$1iv$2@enterprise.cistron.net>
In-Reply-To: <91bnhg$vij$1@enterprise.cistron.net> <E146inG-0000O0-00@the-village.bc.nu>
X-Trace: enterprise.cistron.net 976840922 1631 195.64.65.67 (15 Dec 2000 00:42:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@cistron.nl
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test74 (May 26, 2000)
Originator: miquels@traveler.cistron-office.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

In article <E146inG-0000O0-00@the-village.bc.nu>,
Alan Cox  <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>> Yes, but 2.96 is also binary incompatible with all non-redhat distro's.
>> And since redhat is _the_ distro that commercial entities use to
>> release software for, this was very arguably a bad move.
>
>Except you conveniently ignore a few facts

Doesn't everyone. I should have included a smiley with as comment
that I was only half-joking. Anyway this is the kernel list, and
as such this is becoming off-topic.

Mike.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/