Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 12:26:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 12:26:36 -0400 Received: from waste.org ([209.173.204.2]:25827 "EHLO waste.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 12:26:35 -0400 Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:29:46 -0500 (CDT) From: Oliver Xymoron To: Andreas Dilger cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Subject: Re: Header files and the kernel ABI In-Reply-To: <20020725073221.GP574@clusterfs.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 969 Lines: 21 On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Andreas Dilger wrote: > That brings up the question - how do you tie a particular > to a particular kernel? Should there be a bunch of > directories and/or and/or > or what? While there are efforts to keep > the ABI constant for major stable releases, this is not always true, > so abi-2.4 will certainly not be enough. Maybe linux/abi is a symlink > to the abi directory of currently running kernel? Ideally, the ABI layer would be maintained and packaged separately from both the kernel and glibc to avoid gratuitous changes from either side. -- "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/