Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 20:37:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 20:37:23 -0500 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:12293 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 20:37:19 -0500 Subject: Re: Signal 11 To: michael@linuxmagic.com (Michael Peddemors) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 01:09:29 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <0012141807080M.19494@mistress> from "Michael Peddemors" at Dec 14, 2000 06:07:08 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > o We tell vendors to build RPMv3 , glibc 2.1.x > Curious HOW do you tell vendors?? When they ask. More usefully Dan Quinlann and most vendors put together a recommended set of things to build with and use. It warns about library pitfalls, kernel changes and what packaging is supported. It is far from perfect and nothing like the LSB goals but its a start and following it does give you applications that with a bit of care run on everything. > > o Vendors not being stupid understand that they have a bigger market > > share if they do that. > Ummm.. I remember Oracle's first release... wasn't it JUST redhat?? I believe so, and Adabas was SuSE only, and I doubt either vendor wanted it that way. Both actually ran fine on the other but were not supported. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/