Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 17:15:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 17:15:10 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-5-cust12.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.121.12]:58865 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 17:15:10 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] VM accounting 1/3 trivial From: Alan Cox To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Robert Love , David Mosberger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 25 Jul 2002 23:31:49 +0100 Message-Id: <1027636309.11568.1.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 787 Lines: 16 On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 21:31, Hugh Dickins wrote: > You have no protection against the earlier NORESERVEs, and I'm unclear > whether or not you want that additional protection: it's a little like > "Tainted", you won't want people raising bugs against no-overcommit when There are two things I want to fix there - one is to account noreserve but not fail it, the other is to allow a root reservation As to the other tests I'd rather get it merged, test it hard in a real 2.5 release and then go over and fix the other stuff and add features - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/