Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 17:49:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 17:49:02 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-5-cust12.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.121.12]:40946 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 17:49:00 -0400 Subject: Re: PCI config locking (WAS Re: [RFC/CFT] cmd640 irqlocking fixes)2 From: Alan Cox To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Cc: Andre Hedrick , martin@dalecki.de, Vojtech Pavlik , William Lee Irwin III , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020725144005.8706@smtp.adsl.oleane.com> References: <1027611916.9488.79.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20020725144005.8706@smtp.adsl.oleane.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 26 Jul 2002 00:04:32 +0100 Message-Id: <1027638272.11669.21.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 487 Lines: 12 > Well, all config operations are going through the > pci_read/write_config_xxxx in drivers/pci/pci.c or access.c (2.5) > which will take the pci_lock already. Couldn't x86 use that instead > of stacking another lock ? Yes - done in my tree - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/