DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=LEZEUm4rW2lExc7iiqa7Dkl9OnZSfDoX7rcCf0r63TdXF6scIjYXwqSo8qE4LocjPT
         qPBFD9kXuaLAG3s0Cf1xmUxkkBRMz9Bn0UYRa75yjc7XfLVlMTgGQLrtnePM/kANgF79
         4mOahTFWL6HjFIzcTyq6AkghX9bQHT5IEq60Y=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1305804982.2145.6.camel@lenovo>
References: <1305295404-12129-5-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>
	<4DCFAA80.7040109@jp.fujitsu.com>
	<1305519711.4806.7.camel@mulgrave.site>
	<BANLkTi=oe4Ties6awwhHFPf42EXCn2U4MQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110516084558.GE5279@suse.de>
	<BANLkTinW4s6aT2bZ79sHNgdh5j8VYyJz2w@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110516102753.GF5279@suse.de>
	<BANLkTi=5ON_ttuwFFhFObfoP8EBKPdFgAA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110517103840.GL5279@suse.de>
	<1305640239.2046.27.camel@lenovo>
	<20110517161508.GN5279@suse.de>
	<BANLkTimUJeTbWV_0BzgjrDjY=Wpc-PaG5Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<1305804982.2145.6.camel@lenovo>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 09:06:55 +0900
Message-ID: <BANLkTin0Qdp4S8RdkAGJD0L5zvHwftvZog@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: Correctly check if reclaimer should schedule
 during shrink_slab
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
        KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
        raghu.prabhu13@gmail.com, jack@suse.cz, chris.mason@oracle.com,
        cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, riel@redhat.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1110
Lines: 38

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Colin Ian King
<colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 09:09 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> Hi Colin.
>>
>> Sorry for bothering you. :(
>
> No problem at all, I've very happy to re-test.
>
>> I hope this test is last.
>>
>> We(Mel, KOSAKI and me) finalized opinion.
>>
>> Could you test below patch with patch[1/4] of Mel's series(ie,
>> !pgdat_balanced  of sleeping_prematurely)?
>> If it is successful, we will try to merge this version instead of
>> various cond_resched sprinkling version.
>
> tested with the patch below + patch[1/4] of Mel's series.  300 cycles,
> 2.5 hrs of soak testing: works OK.
>
> Colin

Thanks, Colin.
We are approaching the conclusion for  your help. :)

Mel, KOSAKI.
I will ask test to Andrew Lutomirski.
If he doesn't have a problem, let's go, then.

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/