Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756260Ab1ETAG7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 May 2011 20:06:59 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.216.174]:54051 "EHLO mail-qy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754088Ab1ETAG5 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 May 2011 20:06:57 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LEZEUm4rW2lExc7iiqa7Dkl9OnZSfDoX7rcCf0r63TdXF6scIjYXwqSo8qE4LocjPT qPBFD9kXuaLAG3s0Cf1xmUxkkBRMz9Bn0UYRa75yjc7XfLVlMTgGQLrtnePM/kANgF79 4mOahTFWL6HjFIzcTyq6AkghX9bQHT5IEq60Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1305804982.2145.6.camel@lenovo> References: <1305295404-12129-5-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <4DCFAA80.7040109@jp.fujitsu.com> <1305519711.4806.7.camel@mulgrave.site> <20110516084558.GE5279@suse.de> <20110516102753.GF5279@suse.de> <20110517103840.GL5279@suse.de> <1305640239.2046.27.camel@lenovo> <20110517161508.GN5279@suse.de> <1305804982.2145.6.camel@lenovo> Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 09:06:55 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: Correctly check if reclaimer should schedule during shrink_slab From: Minchan Kim To: Colin Ian King Cc: Mel Gorman , akpm@linux-foundation.org, James Bottomley , KOSAKI Motohiro , raghu.prabhu13@gmail.com, jack@suse.cz, chris.mason@oracle.com, cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, riel@redhat.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1110 Lines: 38 On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Colin Ian King wrote: > On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 09:09 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: >> Hi Colin. >> >> Sorry for bothering you. :( > > No problem at all, I've very happy to re-test. > >> I hope this test is last. >> >> We(Mel, KOSAKI and me) finalized opinion. >> >> Could you test below patch with patch[1/4] of Mel's series(ie, >> !pgdat_balanced  of sleeping_prematurely)? >> If it is successful, we will try to merge this version instead of >> various cond_resched sprinkling version. > > tested with the patch below + patch[1/4] of Mel's series.  300 cycles, > 2.5 hrs of soak testing: works OK. > > Colin Thanks, Colin. We are approaching the conclusion for your help. :) Mel, KOSAKI. I will ask test to Andrew Lutomirski. If he doesn't have a problem, let's go, then. -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/