Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934884Ab1ETQEU (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 May 2011 12:04:20 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.123]:46913 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934561Ab1ETQET (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 May 2011 12:04:19 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=NmbQexcdgr4rtO3OwYGrP5Q3rTMpacrTPhuaXkv4uP8= c=1 sm=0 a=TwWXrjo8ZJIA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:17 a=wdCznIBjWLcPp-_LeY0A:9 a=IVAUTcJEuc1kNFJeNfEA:7 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.242.120.143 Subject: Re: kernel 2.6.39 (user mode linux) crashes (2.6.38 works fine) From: Steven Rostedt To: Darren Hart Cc: richard -rw- weinberger , Toralf =?ISO-8859-1?Q?F=F6rster?= , LKML , user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <4DD68EDF.4030301@linux.intel.com> References: <201105191526.31904.toralf.foerster@gmx.de> <201105192218.18261.toralf.foerster@gmx.de> <20110519204342.GA10792@home.goodmis.org> <201105200937.15322.toralf.foerster@gmx.de> <4DD68EDF.4030301@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 12:04:17 -0400 Message-ID: <1305907458.1465.23.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1362 Lines: 43 On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 08:55 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > I suspect Toralf is hitting the WARN_ON in __unqueue_futex: > > if (WARN_ON(!q->lock_ptr || !spin_is_locked(q->lock_ptr) > || plist_node_empty(&q->list))) > > Toralf, can you instrument that let us know which of conditions is > triggering the WARN_ON? Something like the following should be adequate > to get you the line number. I suspect it is plist_node_empty give the > git bisect results you reported. > > > diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c > index abd5324..7f31bca 100644 > --- a/kernel/futex.c > +++ b/kernel/futex.c > @@ -782,8 +782,11 @@ static void __unqueue_futex(struct futex_q *q) > { > struct futex_hash_bucket *hb; > > - if (WARN_ON(!q->lock_ptr || !spin_is_locked(q->lock_ptr) > - || plist_node_empty(&q->list))) > + if (WARN_ON(!q->lock_ptr)) > + return; > + if (!spin_is_locked(q->lock_ptr)) > + return; > + if (plist_node_empty(&q->list)) > return; > Wait! This is where we need the WARN_ON_SMP(), do we have that patch in? I think UML is UP, and that spin_is_locked() will always return false. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/