Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753536Ab1EUOaf (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 May 2011 10:30:35 -0400 Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:36221 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752315Ab1EUOac (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 May 2011 10:30:32 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6352"; a="92519314" Message-ID: <4DD7CC83.1020700@codeaurora.org> Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 20:00:27 +0530 From: Mohan Pallaka User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100608 Thunderbird/3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mohan Pallaka CC: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, rmk@dyn-67.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pwm: Add stubs for pwm operations References: <1305867584-31929-1-git-send-email-mpallaka@codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: <1305867584-31929-1-git-send-email-mpallaka@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1787 Lines: 62 On 5/20/2011 10:29 AM, Mohan Pallaka wrote: > Chip drivers that support both pwm and non-pwm modes > would encounter compilation errors if the platform doesn't > have support for pwm, even though the chip is programmed > to work in non-pwm mode. Add stubs for pwm functions to > avoid compilation errors in these scenarios. > > Signed-off-by: Mohan Pallaka > --- > include/linux/pwm.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h > index 7c77575..54877f6 100644 > --- a/include/linux/pwm.h > +++ b/include/linux/pwm.h > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ > > struct pwm_device; > > +#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_PWM) > /* > * pwm_request - request a PWM device > */ > @@ -28,4 +29,26 @@ int pwm_enable(struct pwm_device *pwm); > */ > void pwm_disable(struct pwm_device *pwm); > > +#else > + > +struct pwm_device *pwm_request(int pwm_id, const char *label) > +{ > + return NULL; > +} > + > +void pwm_free(struct pwm_device *pwm) { } > + > +int pwm_config(struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns) > +{ > + return -EINVAL; > +} > + > +int pwm_enable(struct pwm_device *pwm) > +{ > + return -EINVAL; > +} > + > +void pwm_disable(struct pwm_device *pwm) { } > + > +#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_PWM */ > #endif /* __LINUX_PWM_H */ > -- > Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. Hi Russell, please review this patch. --Mohan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/